Matros v. . Owen

WiNBORNE, -I.

The defendant, appellant, presents on this appeal the same assignments of error as those presented in Worley v. Pipes, ante, 465.

The provisions of the North Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act, set forth in the opinion in Worley v. Pipes, ante, 465, are applicable to this case. However, the factual situation here differs from that in the Worley case in that here the plaintiff alleges in his complaint and the court finds as facts (1) not only that on 29 December, 1947, defendant was employed as a mechanic by Harry’s Cadillac-Pontiac Company, which was subject to and had accepted…