Legal Opinion

Gaynor v. Quinn

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 22, 1905No. Appeal, No. 358PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal, No. 358, Jan. T., 1904, by defendants, from decree of C. P. Schuylkill Co., Sept. T., 1903, No. 4, on bill in equity in case of Mary E. A. Gaynor et al. y. Elizabeth G. Quinn et al. Bill in equity to enforce a trust, and for an account. Before Marr, J. The court entered a decree in accordance with the prayer of the bill. Error assigned was the decree of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The failure of the court to follow the practice indicated in *363Schmidt v. Baizley, 184 Pa. 527, and Pittsburg Stove & Range Co. v. Pennsylvania Stove Co., 208 Pa. 37, to express the findings of fact and law in separate and numbered clauses or paragraphs, so as to present each one independently and distinctly, has materially increased our labor in reviewing this voluminous record. The bill was to establish a trust as to real estate alleged to have been acquired by the use of the plaintiff’s money for the joint use of herself and Elizabeth G. Quinn, the principal defendant, in whose…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pittsburg Stove & Range Co. v. Pennsylvania Stove Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Schmidt v. BaizleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lombardo v. Gasparini Excavating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. General Mills, Inc. v. SnavelySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Kefover v. Potter Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Rivers v. Delaware Valley Mutual Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Crown Coal & Coke Co. v. Powhatan Mid-Vol Coal Sales, L.L.C.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API