Schmidt v. Baizley
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 256, Jan. T., 1897, by plaintiffs, from decree of C. P. No. 3, Pbila. Co., June T., 1895, No. 1377, dismissing bill in equity. Bill in equity to declare conveyances of real estate null and void.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 256, Jan. T., 1897, by plaintiffs, from decree of C. P. No. 3, Pbila. Co., June T., 1895, No. 1377, dismissing bill in equity. Bill in equity to declare conveyances of real estate null and void. Gobdon, J., filed the following opinion: Tbe plaintiffs are judgment creditors of Alexander Obermeyer, and sue with him and his wife for the purpose of having set aside and declared null and void certain conveyances of real estate in the city of Philadelphia, executed by him to Rudolph R. Baizley, one of the defendants. The said Rudolph R. Baizley subsequently conveyed the premises to John…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
An examination of the testimony in this ease convinces us that the findings of fact made by the learned court below were entirely justified, indeed required, by the evidence before the court. We do not see how any other or different findings could have been made with any propriety. The conclusions of law are so necessarily consequent upon such determinations of fact that they cannot be controverted. We are very clearly of opinion that the decree dismissing the bill was correct, and we affirm it upon the findings of fact and conclusions of law expressed in the opinion. It would have…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Pittsburg Stove & Range Co. v. Pennsylvania Stove Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Gaynor v. QuinnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Hastings Water Co. v. Hastings BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Paine v. Standard Plunger Elevator Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1911