Cox v. Maddux
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Rush Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.
— Suit by the appellees against the appellant upon the following instrument, viz.:
“$800.00. ' Cincinnati, Feb. 8, 187Q.
“One day after date we promise to pay to the order of Maddux Brothers eight hundred dollars, payable at-, value received. Hutchinson & Cox.”
The appellant answered, admitting the execution of the note, that on the 8th day of December, 1873, the appellees brought suit thereon in the U. S. District Court, for the District of Kansas, against Hutchinson alone, and recovered a judgment against him, to which suit the appellant was not made a party.
To this answer the appellees…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Crosby v. JerolomanIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Barnett v. JudayIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Holman v. LangtreeIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Archer v. HeimanIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
- Root v. DillIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. BinkDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1947
- Merriman v. BarkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Field v. Layton & Layton, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1928
- Finch v. GaligherIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
- Beck & Pauli Lith. Co. v. Wacker & Birk B. & M. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.