Legal Opinion

Archer v. Heiman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1863PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from the Vanderbugh Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

Samuel Archer and David Mackey sued Desire D. Walker, Adam Miller, Isaac Heiman and David Heiman upon a note in this form:

*30“Evansville, Ind.,Nov. 13, 1860.
“ Six months after date we promise to pay to the order of Archer & Mackey 219 dollars and 57 cents, waiving benefit of appraisment laws, value received. Desire L. Walker,
“Adam Miller,
“I. & D. Heiman.”

Process as to Walker and Miller was returned “not found;” Isaac and David Hieman answered. That in January, 1862, the plaintiffs instituted an action in the Circuit Court of Dubois county, Indiana, against each of the defendants sued in this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robertson v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1821

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Erwin v. ScottenIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Morrison v. FishelIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Cox v. MadduxIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Marshall v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Conklin v. ConklinIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API