Legal Opinion

State v. Cram

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 25, 1991No. 90-548PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C.J.

On November 20, 1989, defendant and five other individuals entered the grounds of a test firing range facility in Underhill, Vermont, and remained after notice against trespass had been communicated to them. Defendant’s avowed purpose in entering was to prevent the testing by General Electric Company of “gatling guns” and, consequently, delay shipment of the guns to El Salvador, where they were being used by the military to shoot civilians. Defendant was charged with unlawful trespass under 13 V.S.A. § 3705(a)(1). At a pretrial status conference, and again in answer to a motion in limine by…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Walter Ward Dorrell, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. John William Simpson, AKA Brother John SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. CapitoloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. HoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. United States v. SewardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. SextonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  2. Stodghill v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Hoagland v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. ThayerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  5. State v. CramSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API