Legal Opinion

Rosette v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 2005No. Nos. 2004-0524 and 2004-0525PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

{¶ 1} These two discretionary appeals have been consolidated for purposes of oral argument and decision because they arise from analogous facts and present a common legal issue.

Case No. 200k-052k

{¶ 2} On June 11, 2002, appellant, Jose Rosette, filed an action for statutory relief, interest, and costs on behalf of himself and “[a]ll persons who paid off mortgage loans where Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. was the mortgagee, and whose mortgage satisfactions were not timely filed as required by [R.C. 5301.36].” Appellant asked the court to certify two classes: (1) a class 'of Ohio residential…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cline v. Ohio Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Cosgrove v. Williamsburg of Cincinnati Management Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Rice v. CertainTeed Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State ex rel. Sinay v. SoddersOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. In re Guardianship of LombardoOhio Supreme Court · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Cleveland Mobile Radio Sales, Inc. v. Verizon WirelessOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. BartholomewOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State Ex Rel. Butler Township Board of Trustees v. Montgomery County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Nagel v. Huntington National BankOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Radatz v. Fed. Natl. Mtge. Assn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API