State v. Bartholomew
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.
{¶ 1} In this case we are asked to determine whether R.C. 2929.18(A)(1) permits a trial court to order a criminal defendant to pay restitution to Ohio’s reparations fund. We hold that it does.
Background
{¶ 2} Defendant-appellee, Charles W. Bartholomew, pleaded guilty to one count of rape of a minor under 13 years of age in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b). The trial court sentenced him to a prison term of ten years, imposed court costs, and ordered him to “pay $426.00 restitution to the Attorney General’s Victims of Crime [fund] for reimbursement to the victim” for counseling expenses.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rice v. CertainTeed Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. KreischerOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Cleveland Mobile Radio Sales, Inc. v. Verizon WirelessOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. DidionOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Rosette v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. ColonOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. MaurerOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. KiserOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.