Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Quik Serve Foods, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
Introduction
This matter comes before the court on Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority’s (“WMATA”) motion for partial summary judgment on Counts I and II, and the punitive damage component of Count V, of the complaint filed by Quik Serve Foods, Inc. (“Quik Serve”).
Counts I & II allege breach of contract, specifically, the option to purchase and seek damages and specific performance. Count III also alleges breach of contract, specifically, hindrance of the terms of the contract and seeks damages. Count IV alleges breach of the right of first…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Diamond v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Ehrenhaft v. Malcolm Price, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Rieser v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United Partition Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Delta Engineering, Inc.Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · 2014