Legal Opinion

United States v. Crooker

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided January 31, 2019No. : 1:16-CR-2055-RMPPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON, United States District Judge

BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant James Lee Crooker's Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct a Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, ECF No. 100. Defendant argues that his federal criminal conviction should be set aside because he entered into a plea agreement supported by insufficient evidence, for which he was factually innocent, because he was encouraged by ineffective assistance of counsel.

*1100ECF No. 101. A hearing was held in this matter on December 17, 2018. Defendant was represented by attorney Lee Edmond. The Government was represented…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. MORGAN v. ORTIZDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API