Legal Opinion

MORGAN v. ORTIZ

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 26, 2019No. 1:19-cv-16478Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE JAMES MORGAN, Civil Action No. 19-16478(RMB) Petitioner v. OPINION DAVID ORTIZ, Respondent BUMB, United States District Judge This matter comes before the Court upon Petitioner James Morgan’s (“Petitioner”) Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under

28 U.S.C. § 2241

(Pet., ECF No. 1) and his motion to amend the petition. (Mot. to Amend, ECF No. 2.) Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, applicable here under Rule 1, scope of the rules, the clerk must promptly forward…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Charles Bruce v. Warden Lewisburg USPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. CrookerDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API