Legal Opinion

Cacka v. Gaulke

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 15, 1942No. 33,060PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court of McLeod county opening and vacating a judgment.

Plaintiff obtained a default judgment against defendants, Henry F. Proehl and George Gaulke, and entered it April 14, 1987. Throughout the entire proceeding, Henry F. Proehl was designated as Henry L. Proehl. The action was on a promissory note payable to George Gaulke and signed by Proehl. The note, which plaintiff alleged Gaulke assigned to him, seems to have been the cause of the confusion concerning defendant Proehl’s middle initial, for the signature on it appeared to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. D'Autremont v. Anderson Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  2. Casper v. KlippenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. Flanery v. KushaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  4. Hoffman v. FreimuthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fred R. Dunahugh v. Environmental Systems Company, a Delaware Corporation, and Melvyn L. BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  2. Industrial Loan Thrift Corporation v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API