Hoffman v. Freimuth
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the municipal court of St. Paul, Hanft, J., granting a motion to vacate the judgment and to permit defendant to serve an answer.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
On November 17, 1905, a judgment for $81.58 in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant was entered by default in the municipal court of the city of St. Paul. On December 21, 1906, the trial court on motion of the defendant made its order vacating the judgment and permitting the defendant to answer. The plaintiff appealed from the order.
The complaint alleged the execution of five promissory notes, aggregating'the sum of $70, by the defendant to the plaintiff. The defendant’s proposed answer alleged a meritorious defense, and the question here to be determined is whether the court…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Dr. Shoop Family Medicine Co. v. OppligerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Cacka v. GaulkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Nystrom v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932