Casper v. Klippen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Ensign, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.
This is an action against the sheriff of St. Louis eounty and his deputy for wrongfully carrying away and converting to their own use a part of plaintiff’s stock of groceries, of the value of $93, It is also alleged in the complaint that plaintiff was engaged in the business of keeping a grocery store, and that by *354reason of said wrongful acts of defendants Ms credit was destroyed, his business broken up, and he was obliged to sell the rest of his stock for less than its value. He alleges that by reason thereof he was damaged in the sum of $900. On the trial before the court without a jury the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- The Lafayette Ins. Co. v. FRENCHSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Hahn v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Goebel v. HoughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Pond v. EnnisIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- First National Bank v. JaggersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Emerson v. Pacific Coast & Norway Packing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- D'Autremont v. Anderson Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Rauma v. BaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Morrison County Lumber Co. v. DuclosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Force v. GottwaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.