Legal Opinion
Farris v. Coleman Co., Inc.
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Decided October 11, 2000No. 2:99CV125-BPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOGEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter is presently before the court on defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment or in the alternative to Exclude Expert Testimony on the grounds that plaintiffs are unable to prove one or more elements essential to their claims, or in the alternative, that the expert testimony of William I. Noyes does not satisfy the standards for expert testimony formulated by the supreme court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) and Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137, 119 S.Ct. 1167,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Impossible Electronics Techniques, Inc. v. Wackenhut Protective Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Forbes v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2005
- King v. Synthes (U.S.A.)District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2006
- Forbes v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2005