Legal Opinion

Gramatan National Bank & Trust Co. v. Moody

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 1, 1950PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

This is an action of contract in which the plaintiff seeks to recover the unpaid balance of a note. The case was tried to a jury, and at the close of the evidence the plaintiff and the defendants presented motions for directed verdicts. The plaintiff’s motion was denied and that of the defendants'was granted, and the case comes here on the plaintiff’s exceptions to these rulings.

The facts, most of which were not in dispute, were these. The principal sum set forth in the note declared on is $551.90, payable in thirty-six monthly instalments of $15.33, the first instalment being due sixty days…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Russell v. Bond & Goodwin Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Macklin v. MacklinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Reynolds v. Park Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Standard Acceptance Corp. v. ChapinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Beacon Trust Co. v. RyderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Quality Finance Co. v. HurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  2. Elbar Realty, Inc. v. City Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  3. Espinola v. Riley's Liquors, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1994
  4. Watertown Federal Savings & Loan Association v. SpanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  5. Eaton Factors, Inc. v. BeckwithMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API