Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Doris

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1997No. S-6474PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

We must decide here whether it was error to deny Maynard Johnson’s Civil Rule 60(b) motion to set aside a probate order approving a final accounting and distribution. Johnson alleged, after the probate order was entered, that excessive professional fees and costs were incurred during administration of the estate. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Clifford M. Johnson died in 1983. His will provided that the residue of his estate would be distributed to his natural son, Maynard Johnson. The will named decedent’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hartland v. HartlandAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Gravel v. Alaskan Village, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1967
  3. McCracken v. DavisAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Farrell Ex Rel. Farrell v. Dome LaboratoriesAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Matter of Estate of RidlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wright v. ShortenAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Cook v. RowlandAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Snook v. BowersAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In Re Estate of JohnsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Government Employees Insurance Co. v. GonzalezAlaska Supreme Court · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API