Kirchner v. Riherd
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENSON, Justice:
The trial court dismissed Riherd’s complaint seeking damages for personal injuries. The trial court relied upon the rule of law that causes of action shall not be split. The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court on the theory there was no splitting of a cause of action. We granted discretionary review and reverse.
Riherd sued Kirchner in circuit court for personal injuries suffered in an automobile accident. Kirchner filed a motion to dismiss, pleading res judicata as a result of Riherd’s splitting his cause of action and later filed motion for summary judgment.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hays v. SturgillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
- Moore v. Gas and Electric ShopCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Pilcher v. LigonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891
3Cited by9 opinions
- Capital Holding Corp. v. BaileyKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
- Miller v. Administrative Office of the CourtsKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
- prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,617 Creasy Conn, and Continental Insurance Company, Intervening v. Fales Division of Mathewson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Blair v. GEICO General InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2013
- Arnold v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.