Legal Opinion

Lee v. MERCHANTS COLLECTION ASSN. OF OAKLAND

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 6, 1957No. Civ. 17423PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

The questions raised by plaintiff’s appeal from a judgment in her favor in this action for conversion of her automobile are:

1. In estimating plaintiff’s damage were the deductions made by the court proper?

2. Did the chattel mortgagee waive its lien ?

3. Was the municipal court judgment res judicata?

4. Was plaintiff entitled to punitive damages ?

5. Should plaintiff have been allowed interest 1

6. Rejection of evidence.

Record

Defendant * operating a collection agency levied execution upon plaintiff’s automobile under a judgment which was subsequently set aside for lack of service. It was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Todhunter v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Horton v. GoodenoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Maier v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Stein v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Card Construction Co. v. LedbetterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Dakota Gardens Apartment Investors" B" v. PudwillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Bedi v. McMullanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. NICO Alloys v. American Metal Group CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API