Legal Opinion
Bedi v. McMullan
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 25, 1984No. B001151PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment dismissing their complaint for forcible entry and detainer following the sustaining of defendants’ demurrer without leave to amend. We reverse.
Facts and Proceeding Below
For purposes of this appeal we accept as true the properly pleaded factual allegations of the complaint. (Thompson v. County of Alameda (1980) 27 Cal.3d 741, 746 [167 Cal.Rptr. 70, 614 P.2d 728, 12 A.L.R.4th 701].) The allegations must be liberally construed with a view to attaining substantial justice among the parties. (Code Civ. Proc., § 452; King v. Central Bank (1977) 18…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Thompson v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- King v. Central BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Jordan v. TalbotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- McCauley v. WellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Kee v. BeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Munoz v. MacMillanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Bel Courtyard Investments, Inc. v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- Duke v. Superior Court of Kern Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Glass v. NajafiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.