Westinghouse Co. v. Gainor
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Cheboygan; Shepherd, J. Assumpsit by the Westinghouse Company against William Gainor upon promissory notes. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This suit was brought upon three notes,— one due January 1, 1897, for $100, one due January 1, 1898, for $100, and one due January 1, 1899, for $100. The defense was that the notes were given for a bean thresher, which was sold with a warranty, which was not' met. From a judgment rendered in favor of the defendant, the case is brought here by writ of error.
The material parts of the order given for the machine read as follows:
“Cheboygan, July 31, 1896.
“This is to certify that I have this day agreed to purchase of Westinghouse & Co., of Schenectady, N. Y., through their agent, Charles Bates, of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Walter A. Wood Reaping & Mowing Machine Co. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Platt v. BroderickMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Osborn v. RawsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by6 opinions
- Grinnell v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Hakes v. ThayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Lake v. Western Silo Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Randall v. J. A. Fay & Egan Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
- J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. HuberMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.