Osborn v. Rawson
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Eaton. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Marston, O. J.
Bawson and Thatcher sued to recover upon a note given by Osborn. The defendant pleaded the general issue, with a notice given therewith, that the note was given on the purchase of a reaper sold with a warranty, and alleging a breach thereof.
*207On the trial the defendant introduced testimony tending to show that the reaper would not do first-class work • that he had notified the plaintiff’s agents; that they had tried to do first-class work with the reaper and failed, and that he wanted them to take back the reaper and deliver up his note.
The court directed a verdict in favor of the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Hakes v. ThayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Exhaust Ventilator Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. HuberMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- R. K. Carter & Co. v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Westinghouse Co. v. GainorMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.