Legal Opinion

Osborn v. Rawson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1881PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Eaton. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Marston, O. J.

Bawson and Thatcher sued to recover upon a note given by Osborn. The defendant pleaded the general issue, with a notice given therewith, that the note was given on the purchase of a reaper sold with a warranty, and alleging a breach thereof.

*207On the trial the defendant introduced testimony tending to show that the reaper would not do first-class work • that he had notified the plaintiff’s agents; that they had tried to do first-class work with the reaper and failed, and that he wanted them to take back the reaper and deliver up his note.

The court directed a verdict in favor of the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hakes v. ThayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Exhaust Ventilator Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  3. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. HuberMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. R. K. Carter & Co. v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Westinghouse Co. v. GainorMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API