Legal Opinion

Rocha v. Hanover Insurance

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided April 7, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGreco, J.

This is a Dist./Mun. Cts. R A. D. A., Rule 8C, appeal by plaintiff Leonel Rocha (“Rocha”) of the allowance of summary judgment in favor of defendant Hanover Insurance Company (“Hanover”). Rocha’s complaint sought damages for Hanover’s alleged breach of contract and G.L.c. 176D, §3 unfair claim settlement practices in violation of G.L.C. 93A.

The origin of the parties’ dispute was a motor vehicle accident in November, 1996 which involved Rocha and Hanover’s insured, Carol Connors (“Connors”). After Rocha commenced a tort action, the parties agreed to submit the matter to arbitration. Rocha…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fidler v. E. M. Parker Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Peters v. WallachMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Miles v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. Hopkins v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  5. Allstate Insurance v. BearceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sullivan v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API