Simms v. Tingle
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentPaul Ward, Associate Justice
A careful consideration of the wording of the Complaint in this case and review of the many authorities dealing with the question here under consideration leads me to a different conclusion than that reached by the majority.
First, attention is called to the well established rule that a Demurrer will be sustained to a Complaint which does not state a cause of action or to one that pleads only conclusions of the law. See: Civil Code Page 96, Section 109; Keith v. Freeman, et al, 43 Ark. 296; Southern Orchard Planting Company v. Gore, 83 Ark. 78, 102 S. W. 709; Pharr v. Knox, 145 Ark. 4, 223 S.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Leete v. Griswold PostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Raub v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Ward v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Rogers v. VreelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Seubold v. Fort Smith Special School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.