Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Vreeland

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 1936No. Civ. 11016PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment in favor of defendant entered after a general demurrer interposed by defendant was sustained by the court below without leave to amend. The gravamen of the complaint, containing three causes of action, is the charge of negligence on the part of defendant in driving his automobile so carelessly that the same upset, as the result of which plaintiffs, who were riding therein, were injured. After alleging such negligence on the part of defendant, the complaint seeks to justify the existence of a cause of action for negligence by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Crawford v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Chaplowe v. PowsnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  3. Eubanks v. KielsmeierWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Rocha v. HulenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Clendenning v. SimermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Whitechat v. GuyetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Raub v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Kerstetter v. ElfmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Fountain v. TidwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API