Legal Opinion
United States v. 43.47 Acres of Land
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 31, 1999No. Civil H-85-1078 (PCD), Civ. 3:98cv1113 (PCD)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS
DORSEY, Senior District Judge.
Currently pending are Schagticoke Tribal Nation’s (the “Tribe”) motions to consolidate and for separate trial to determine tribal status. The Tribe filed identical motions in the above captioned cases, United States v. 43.47 Acres of Land, et al. (the “condemnation action”), and Schagticoke Tribal Nation v. Kent School Corporation, et al. (the “land claim action” or “Schagticoke II”). As discussed below, the motions are denied without prejudice. Also pending is the Tribe’s request for leave to file third supplemental memorandum in support…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Katsaros v. CodyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Ricci v. Chicago Mercantile ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- John Doe No. 1 v. Knights of ColumbusDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Robinson v. SalazarDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
- Mashpee Wampanoag Tribal Council, Inc. v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- United States v. 43.47 Acres of LandDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- Wynne v. East HartfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021