Pandiscio v. Atkinson
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtDoerfer, J.
This case arises out of a dispute between the parties over amounts due under the terms of a promissory note which had a clause prohibiting prepayment for five years. The plaintiff took the position that the defendants, CBG Nominee Trust (CBG), had accelerated the note and lost their right to a prepayment penalty. In the circumstances described below, the parties entered into a settlement agreement. The plaintiff *483subsequently claimed that the amounts payable under the settlement agreement amounted to interest on the note at a rate that violated the criminal usury statute, G. L. c. 271, § 49,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Town Planning & Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Amesbury Specialty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Margolies v. HopkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Wilshire Enterprises, Inc. v. Taunton Pearl Works, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
- Ferreira v. YaredMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Richardson v. Department of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vasconcellos v. Arbella Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- H.L. Turner Group, Inc. v. City of MethuenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020