Legal Opinion

Ferreira v. Yared

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 27, 1992No. 90-P-582PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

As presented by the parties, the appeal raises the question whether private, i.e., noninstitutional, mortgagees are subject to the limitation on prepayment penalties contained in G. L. c. 183, § 56. The borrower had paid the mortgage note in full after the lender had accelerated the note because of earlier payment defaults by the borrower. In such circumstances, we conclude, the payment is not a “prepayment” and the lender may not invoke a prepayment penalty. The statutory question presented, therefore, becomes academic.

From affidavits, interrogatories, and a stipulation offered in connection…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Lhd Realty Corporation, Debtor. Appeal of National Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Kilpatrick v. . Germania Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Tan v. California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Slevin Container Corp. v. Provident Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. George H. Nutman, Inc. v. Aetna Business Credit, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clean Harbors, Inc. v. John Hancock Life InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  2. Kirk v. KitchensColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Pandiscio v. AtkinsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  4. Williams v. SmithMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API