Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Reedy

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 25, 1902PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Before Buchanan, J., December, 1900. Action by W. P. Gardner against James Reedy, A. M. Dofton, Jr., and their tenants. From judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. cites: As to the construction of Rev. Stat., 331: 10 S. E. R., 331; 16 S. E. R., 152; 22 S. E. R., 608; 106 U. S., 384; 177 U. S., 327; 35 S. E. R-, 439122 Ark., 178; 10 S. E. R., 33° 1 32 S. E. R., 291. Old action of ejectment is changed by Code: 15 S. C., 273. Mere irregularities do not avoid tax deed: 18 S.…

Read the full summary

Before Buchanan, J., December, 1900. Action by W. P. Gardner against James Reedy, A. M. Dofton, Jr., and their tenants. From judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. cites: As to the construction of Rev. Stat., 331: 10 S. E. R., 331; 16 S. E. R., 152; 22 S. E. R., 608; 106 U. S., 384; 177 U. S., 327; 35 S. E. R-, 439122 Ark., 178; 10 S. E. R., 33° 1 32 S. E. R., 291. Old action of ejectment is changed by Code: 15 S. C., 273. Mere irregularities do not avoid tax deed: 18 S. E. R., 523; 27 S. E- R., 951. Erroneous boundaries do not annul the deed: 2 Brev., 402. Not necessary to give purchaser…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

1 Though there are numerous exceptions in this case, they are all dependent upon the question whether a defaulting taxpayer whose land was sold by the sheriff for the payment of taxes can maintain an action for the recovery of the land, or for the recovery of the possession thereof, unless it is brought within two years from the date of sale, although two years have not elapsed since the purchaser was put in possession of the land by the sheriff, who, had failed to take exclusive possession when he levied upon the land. Section 351 of…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dibble v. BryantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  2. Collier v. GoesslingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
  3. Glymph v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  4. Leysath v. LeysathSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
  5. King v. JamesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API