Hatcher v. Hatcher
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBeocK, J.
The only question presented by this appeal is whether the order appealed from contains sufficient findings of fact to support an award of alimony pendente lite and counsel fees.
G.S. 50-16.8(f), which is applicable to this case, provides: “When an application is made for alimony pendente lite, the parties shall be heard orally, upon affidavit, verified pleading, or other proof, and the judge shall find the facts from the evidence so presented.” (Emphasis added.) As pointed out by Parker, J., in Blake v. Blake, 6 N.C. App. 410, 170 S.E. 2d 87, the present statutory requirement for findings of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Blake v. BlakeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
3Cited by6 opinions
- Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Austin v. AustinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Peoples v. PeoplesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Sprinkle v. SprinkleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.