Pepitone v. Winn
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcCormack, J.
NATURE OF CASE
The issue in this case is whether attorney fees are mandatory under the provision of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 76-2,120(12) (Cum. Supp. 2004) which provides in part: “If a conveyance of real property is not made in compliance with this section, the purchaser shall have a cause of action against the seller and may recover the actual damages, court costs, and reasonable attorney’s fees.”
BACKGROUND.
Joseph Pepitone and Elizabeth Pepitone purchased a single family residence in Omaha, Nebraska. They subsequently discovered a preexisting sewer backup problem in the basement of the residence…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bocquet v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Bisson v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Kolupar v. Wilde Pontiac Cadillac, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Spaghetti Ltd. Partnership v. WolfeNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- Japp v. Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Burns v. NielsenNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
- Conley v. BrazerNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
- Steward Software Co. v. KopchoColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Hutchison v. KulaNebraska Court of Appeals · 2019
- ARL CREDIT SERVICES, INC. v. PiperNebraska Court of Appeals · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.