Legal Opinion
Teeval Co. v. Stern
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 11, 1950No. 1; No. 2PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Loughran, Ch. J.
In these six cases questions are raised as to the constitutional validity of two statutes.' One is the New York State rent control statute which became effective May 1, 1950 (L. 1950, ch. 250). The other is the so-called Sharkey Law (Local Laws, 1949, No. 73 of City of New York; Administrative Code of City of New York, § 1741-7.0) which was validated by the State Legislature (L. 1950, ch. 1) after this court had held it to be unconstitutional. (F. T. B. Realty Corp. v. Goodman, 300 N. Y. 140.)
*357We take up first the case of Teeval Co., Inc., v. Stern, an action that was commenced…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Testa v. KattSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Claflin v. HousemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Marcus Brown Holding Co. v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Inganamort v. Borough of Fort LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Hutton Pk. Gardens v. West Orange Town CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Marshal House, Inc. v. Rent Control Board of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- I. L. F. Y. Co. v. Temporary State Housing Rent CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Hutton Park Gardens v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.