Legal Opinion
Texaco, Inc. v. Layton
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 3, 1964No. 40212Published
1Opinion of the Court
395 P.2d 393 (1964)
TEXACO, INC., a Foreign Corporation, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
Daniel J. LAYTON, Jr., Administrator of the Estate of Jimmy Alexander, Deceased, Defendant in Error.
No. 40212.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
March 3, 1964.
Rehearing Denied September 15, 1964.
Hudson, Hudson, Wheaton, Kyle & Brett, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.
Arthurs, Blackstock & McMillan, Bristow, George Sam Caporal, Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.
JACKSON, Justice.
In the trial court this wrongful death action was brought by plaintiff Daniel Layton, Jr., as administrator of the estate of Jimmy Alexander, who, with…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Doran v. ThomsenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Texaco, Inc. v. LaytonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Ellis & Lewis, Inc. v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Keith v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.