Legal Opinion

Keith v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 22, 1954No. 35982PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■CORN, Justice.

Plaintiff, administrator of the estate of Dudley Lancaster, deceased, brought this action for the benefit of the surviving widow and minor child, seeking to recover damages for the alleged wrongful death of deceased. A jury trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for defendant.

Disposition of the questions presented by this appeal does not require an extended recitation either of the issues presented by the amended pleadings upon which the case was tried, or of the evidence adduced by the parties.

The corporate defendant owned a wholesale marketing establishment in Seminole,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gulf Refining Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  2. Cities Service Oil Co. v. KindtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Southern Construction Co. v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Barker v. General Petroleum Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Taylor v. LangleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Flick v. CrouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. Mistletoe Express Service, Inc. v. CulpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. Stroud v. Arthur Andersen & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. Page v. HardySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. Hovatter v. Shell Oil CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API