Legal Opinion

West Virginia Fire & Casualty Co. v. Stanley

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 2004No. 31230, 31532PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAYNARD, Chief Justice:

In this appeal from the Circuit Court of Mason County, we are asked to review an order granting summary judgment to an insurance company in a declaratory judgment action. Specifically, the circuit court found that the insurance company has no duty to its insureds in an action arising from the alleged sexual misconduct of an insured minor because coverage is precluded by the “accident” requirement and “intentional-injury” exclusion in the pertinent insurance policy. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

I

FACTS

Glen and Helen Stanley, defendants below in the underlying…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Painter v. PeavyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Harless v. First National Bank in FairmontWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. National Mutual Insurance v. McMahon & Sons, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. PitroloWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Keffer v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1970

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Brandon Pegg v. Grant HerrnbergerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  2. Rhodes v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  3. Weigle v. Pifer ex rel. City of Vienna Police DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2015
  4. Hutchinson v. West Virginia State PoliceDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2010
  5. Lester v. City of GilbertDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2015

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API