Legal Opinion

McElyea v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 23, 2004No. CA CR 03-851PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olly Neal, Judge.

In this appeal from the Washington County Circuit Court, appellant David McElyea challenges “whether the trial court erred in holding that the offense of robbery did not require a specific culpable mental state for the element of employing or threatening to employ physical force.”1 As we understand appellant’s argument, he submits a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence convicting him. He also argues that the trial court abused its discretion in denying him the opportunity to make a proper argument to the jury, “thereby denying Appellant a fair trial and due process as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Barrett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Cummings v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Proctor v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Turner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McElyea v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. United States v. Tyren CervenakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
  3. United States v. Edrick EllisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025
  4. McElyea v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  5. United States v. Tyren CervenakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API