Legal Opinion

McElyea v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 23, 2004No. CA CR 03-851Published

1Opinion of the Court

189 S.W.3d 67 (2004)

87 Ark. App. 103

David McELYEA

v.

STATE of Arkansas.

No. CA CR 03-851.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division IV.

June 23, 2004.

Charles L. Stutte, Fayetteville, for Appellant.

Mike Beebe, Att'y Gen., by: David J. Davies, Ass't Att'y Gen., Little Rock, for Appellee.

OLLY NEAL, Judge.

In this appeal from the Washington County Circuit Court, appellant David McElyea challenges "whether the trial court erred in holding that the offense of robbery did not require a specific culpable mental state for the element of employing or threatening to employ physical force."[1] As we understand…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Barrett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Cummings v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Proctor v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Perry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API