Legal Opinion

I. Oliver Engebretson, Inc. v. Aruba Palm Beach Hotel & Casino

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 4, 1984No. 83 Civ. 1552 (SWK)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KRAM, District Judge.

The above-captioned action is before this Court upon the motion of defendants Aruba Palm Beach Hotel & Casino and Aruven, N.V. (“the Aruba defendants”) to dismiss for want of in personam jurisdiction, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or, in the alternative, to dismiss pursuant to the doctrine of forum non conveniens. For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied.

BACKGROUND

Aruven, N.V. (“Aruven”) is a corporation organized under the laws of the Netherlands Antilles with its principal place of business in…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  4. Frummer v. Hilton Hotels International, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Silver v. Great American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Steven Welinsky and Eileen Welinsky v. Resort of the World D.N v. D/B/A Maho Beach Hotel & CasinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  2. Darby v. Compagnie National Air FranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  3. Tripmasters, Inc. v. Hyatt International Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  4. ICC Primex Plastics Corp. v. LA/ES Laminati Estrusi Termoplastici S.P.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  5. Darby v. Compagnie Nationale Air FranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API