Special Fund Division v. Arizona Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ACKERMAN, Judge.
¶ 1 Petitioner (“Special Fund”) seeks Rule 10 special action review of a decision of the Industrial Commission of Arizona (“Commission”). At issue is the interpretation of Arizona Reviáed Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 23-1044(E) (1995), which provides for apportionment of an award in cases of successive injuries. We affirm the Commission’s decision.
FACTS
¶ 2 Respondent employee (“Claimant”) suffered three separate industrial injuries. The first occurred in 1988, when Claimant suffered a back injury while performing heavy-duty work. This injury caused permanent…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ossic v. Verde Central MinesArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Ronquillo v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- Alsbrooks v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- McKinney v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- PFS v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Parra v. Pedus, Transcontinental Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006