Parra v. Pedus, Transcontinental Insurance Company
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ESPINOSA, Judge.
¶ 1 Petitioner employee Rito Parra was working for respondent employer Pedus when he sustained a work-related injury in July 2003. At that time, he was receiving permanent partial disability benefits for a work-related injury he had sustained in 2000. The Industrial Commission reduced Parra’s monthly temporary total disability benefits for the 2003 injury by more than the amount he was receiving for the 2000 injury. Parra requested a hearing, arguing the Commission had improperly applied A.R.S. § 23-1044 to apportion his benefits instead of calculating them under A.R.S.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Russell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Parsons v. Bekins FreightArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Whyte v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Le Duc v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.