Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Zisook

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1981No. M.R. 2517, M.R. 2536, M.R. 2552 consPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ryan

These disciplinary cases concern the scope of an attorney’s fifth amendment privilege against incriminating himself during proceedings before the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission. The attorneys, Sheldon Oliver Zisook, Jeffrey A. Brody and Basil Chris Elias (respondents), received subpoenas to testify concerning certain matters issued at the request of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (Commission). The subpoenas duces tecum received by Zisook and Elias also requested the production of certain documents. Each respondent, through his attorney, informed the…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. KubatIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. ReddIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DOWD & DOWD, LTD., a Professional Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Downtown Disposal Services, Inc. v. The City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
  5. In Re Estate of BurgesonIllinois Supreme Court · 1988

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API