Legal Opinion

Bohart v. Hanna

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2006No. CV-06-0225-AP-ELPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERCH, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 This case concerns a challenge by Appellant Robert Bohart to the nomination petitions of David Goulet, a candidate for Glendale City Council. The trial court ruled that Goulet’s petitions substantially complied with Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 16-314 (Supp.2005), and that Goulet should therefore remain on the primary ballot. Appellee/Real Party in Interest Goulet has moved to dismiss the notice of appeal filed by Appellant Bohart, alleging that it was not timely filed. We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 16-351(A) (Supp.2005).

¶2 The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme CourtArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Bedard v. GonzalesArizona Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hansen v. O'ReillySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
  2. Caruso v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. Bahney Dedolph v. Lois Jean McDermottArizona Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Klebba v. CarpenterArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Daniel Lachance, Henry Stephen Conroy v. County of Cochise Cochise County Jail DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API