Bohart v. Hanna
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERCH, Vice Chief Justice.
¶ 1 This case concerns a challenge by Appellant Robert Bohart to the nomination petitions of David Goulet, a candidate for Glendale City Council. The trial court ruled that Goulet’s petitions substantially complied with Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 16-314 (Supp.2005), and that Goulet should therefore remain on the primary ballot. Appellee/Real Party in Interest Goulet has moved to dismiss the notice of appeal filed by Appellant Bohart, alleging that it was not timely filed. We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 16-351(A) (Supp.2005).
¶2 The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme CourtArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Bedard v. GonzalesArizona Supreme Court · 1978
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hansen v. O'ReillySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- Caruso v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Bahney Dedolph v. Lois Jean McDermottArizona Supreme Court · 2012
- Klebba v. CarpenterArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- Daniel Lachance, Henry Stephen Conroy v. County of Cochise Cochise County Jail DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.