Legal Opinion

United States v. Payment Processing Center, LLC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 26, 2006No. Civil Action 06-0725PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RICE, United States Magistrate Judge.

Defendant Payment Processing Center, LLC (“PPC”) contends it should be permitted under state law, 15 Pa. Cons.Stat. Ann. § 8945, to indemnify seven corporate agents who are defendants in a mail fraud injunction action under 18 U.S.C. § 1345, and to advance legal fees and costs to each individual defendant. All of PPC’s funds, however, are subject to a court-ordered property restraint pursuant to § 1345, which the government contends should remain intact to preserve restitution for alleged fraud victims. Thus, PPC’s assertion of its state…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. MonsantoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Infinity Group Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Speqtrum, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API