Legal Opinion
Amwax Corp. v. Chadwick
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 25, 1992No. 10026PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The defendants appeal from a judgment for $1484 for the plaintiff, after a court trial. The defendants claim that the trial court abused its discretion in (1) finding that there was a legally enforceable oral lease between the parties, (2) allowing testimony *740about lost prospective profits, (3) finding lost profits of $24,000, and (4) failing to grant the defendants’ motion for judgment at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
This action arises from a breach of an alleged oral lease between the plaintiff and the defendants. The plaintiff was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Buckman v. People Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Gianetti v. Norwalk HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Beckman v. JALICH HOMES, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Hammer v. Mount Sinai HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Robinson v. WeitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & KotkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Westport Taxi Service, Inc. v. Westport Transit DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Gerber & Hurley, Inc. v. CCC Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Mack v. LaValleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Ambrogio v. Beaver Road AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.