Legal Opinion

VTR, INCORPORATED v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 30, 1969No. 67 Civ. 2556PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYAN, District Judge:

Defendants, Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company (Goodyear) and Kelly-Springfield Tire Company (Kelly), move under Rule 12(b) F.R.Civ.P. to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 F.R.Civ.P. Since affidavits have been submitted by the parties going beyond the allegations of the amended complaint, the motion will be treated as one for summary judgment. 1

Plaintiff, VTR, Incorporated, commenced this action in the New York Supreme Court for the County of New York, alleging a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Kirke La Shelle Co. v. Paul Armstrong Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Productive Inventions, Inc., a Corporation v. Trico Products Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  4. Harrison v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Scm Corporation v. Radio Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Carma Developers (California), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hecht v. Pro-Football, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  3. Tymshare, Inc. v. William J. Covell. William J. Covell v. Tymshare, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  4. Stanley McDonald Norman R. Hagfors, and Clayton Jensen v. Johnson & JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  5. McClain v. Octagon Plaza, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API