Legal Opinion
State for Use of Board of County Com'rs of Pontotoc County Ex Rel. Braly v. Ford
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 16, 1941No. 30003PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
This is a taxpayer’s action instituted pursuant to sections 5964, 5965, O. S. 1931, 62 Okla. Stat. Ann. §§ 372, 373, against a former county treasurer of Pontotoc county and his surety, and certain other parties, to recover sinking fund money allegedly expended in an unlawful manner for certain securities.
The petition contained two counts; the first, against the treasurer and his surety to recover the full amount of the money expended; the second, against the treasurer and others for whose benefit the expenditure was made.
Section 5964, supra, makes public officers personally liable for the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Schilling v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- State Ex Rel. Morrison v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- State Ex Rel. Sheel v. IngramSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Bank of Chelsea v. School Dist. No. 1, Rogers Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- State Ex Rel. Payne v. School Dist. No. 97Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Tulsa Industrial Authority v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- State Ex Rel. Wright v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- City of Broken Arrow v. Bass Pro Outdoor World, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Hathaway v. State ex rel. Medical Research & Technical AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.