Legal Opinion

Keville v. Hollister Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 7, 1972No. Civ. 39436PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLEMING, J.

The Hollister Estate Company, a California corporation (Estate), owned the Hollister Ranch in Santa Barbara County. In July 1962 Estate conveyed to plaintiffs and others (all shareholders in Estate) as tenants in common a 50 percent undivided interest “in any and all minerals in, upon or under, and any and all mineral rights in and to” the Hollister Ranch. Estate, however, reserved for itself, its successors and assigns, “. . . the sole and exclusive right and power to enter into and execute leases and agreements for the purpose of prospecting, exploring and mining for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Wong v. Di GraziaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Farmland Irrigation Co. v. DopplmaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Dallapi v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Hanson v. WareSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Spurlock v. Santa Fe Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API