Uniroyal Chemical Co. v. Drexel Chemical Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge:
Defendant Drexel Chemical Company, Inc. (“Drexel”) moves to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff Uniroyal Chemical Company, Inc. (“Uniroyal”) pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), (2) and (6). For the reasons state below, defendant’s motion (Document # 18) is DENIED.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Uniroyal is a New Jersey corporation with its principal place of business in Middlebury, Connecticut. Uniroyal is in the business of, among other things, researching, manufacturing, marketing, and selling pesticides. Defendant Drexel is a Tennessee corporation with…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cohen v. ROLL-A-COVER, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Stanley Works Isr. Ltd. v. 500 Grp., Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
- Titan Sports, Inc. v. Turner Broadcasting Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
- Bulldog New York LLC v. Pepsico, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Victor G. Reiling Associates v. Fisher-Price, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.