Legal Opinion

Platt v. City and County of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1910No. Sac. No. 1852PublishedCited by 27 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is an action brought by a taxpayer of the city and county of San Francisco to obtain a judgment perpetually enjoining defendant city and county and certain of its officers from proceeding in the matter of printing or lithographing, signing, etc., advertising for sale, opening bids for the purchase of and selling certain municipal bonds, in the sum of one million nine hundred thousand dollars, to be known as the “Geary Street Railway Bonds,” and other municipal bonds in the sum of one hundred and twenty thousand dollars, to be known as- the “Market Street Railway Bonds.” A demurrer to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Claiborne County v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. In Re PfahlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Davoust v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Sheehan v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Hyatt v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. City of Boston v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Browne v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Sunset Tel. & Tel. Co. v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. City & County of San Francisco v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Herbert v. RiddellDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API