Legal Opinion
Mangusi v. Vigiliotti
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 4, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
In the original action of summary process, the plaintiff in error, Mangusi, was the defendant, and Vigiliotti and wife were plaintiffs. Both Mangusi and Vigiliotti and wife reside in the town of New Haven. The complaint alleges that on May 15th, 1923, one Willard A. Robinson executed a lease to Mangusi of certain premises in the town of North Haven. In the lease, a copy of which is annexed to the complaint, the term stated is four years from January 1st, 1924. Between the signatures of Robinson and Mangusi, the signature of Angelo Vigiliotti appears, but it is not claimed that he signed in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Welch v. WadsworthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
- Canfield v. GregorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Goldberg v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Lewisohn v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
- C. & C. Electric Motor Co. v. D. Frisbie & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Summer Cottagers' Ass'n of Cape May v. City of Cape MaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Basak v. DamutzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- O'Keefe v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Dennen v. SearleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Flaxman v. Capitol City Press, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.